Running nixpkgs-update (https://nix-community.org/update-bot/) with UPDATE_INFO: elpa 2025.06.001 -> 2025.06.002 https://repology.org/project/elpa/versions
attrpath: elpa
Checking auto update branch...
No auto update branch exists
[version] 
[version] updated version and sha256
[rustCrateVersion] 
[rustCrateVersion] No cargoHash found
[golangModuleVersion] 
[golangModuleVersion] Not a buildGoModule package with vendorHash
[npmDepsVersion] 
[npmDepsVersion] No npmDepsHash
[updateScript] 
[updateScript] skipping because derivation has no updateScript
Diff after rewrites:
diff --git a/pkgs/by-name/el/elpa/package.nix b/pkgs/by-name/el/elpa/package.nix
index 2247ce9dc58b..2fda624d90e0 100644
--- a/pkgs/by-name/el/elpa/package.nix
+++ b/pkgs/by-name/el/elpa/package.nix
@@ -28,13 +28,13 @@ assert blas.isILP64 == scalapack.isILP64;
 
 stdenv.mkDerivation rec {
   pname = "elpa";
-  version = "2025.06.001";
+  version = "2025.06.002";
 
   passthru = { inherit (blas) isILP64; };
 
   src = fetchurl {
     url = "https://elpa.mpcdf.mpg.de/software/tarball-archive/Releases/${version}/elpa-${version}.tar.gz";
-    sha256 = "sha256-/usf6hq0qGcLjTJAdl7wragoBi737JtzXuy6KEhRXJQ=";
+    sha256 = "sha256-3jGAwG4rDbtWk56ErRpf0WhEZb04rSGWeS0PQCiTf9o=";
   };
 
   patches = [

Successfully finished processing
[check][nixpkgs-review]
## `nixpkgs-review` result

Generated using [`nixpkgs-review`](https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review).

Command: `nixpkgs-review --extra-nixpkgs-config '{ allowBroken = false; }'`
Commit: `071a3b9d25568ce2b66f79431fd65a1e9bfbe3e9`

---
### `x86_64-linux`
<details>
  <summary>:white_check_mark: 6 packages built:</summary>
  <ul>
    <li>elpa</li>
    <li>elpa.dev</li>
    <li>elpa.doc</li>
    <li>elpa.man</li>
    <li>siesta</li>
    <li>siesta-mpi</li>
  </ul>
</details>

Automatic update generated by [nixpkgs-update](https://github.com/nix-community/nixpkgs-update) tools. This update was made based on information from https://repology.org/project/elpa/versions.

meta.description for elpa is: Eigenvalue Solvers for Petaflop-Applications

meta.homepage for elpa is: https://elpa.mpcdf.mpg.de/




###### Updates performed
- Version update

###### To inspect upstream changes





###### Impact

<b>Checks done</b>

---

- built on NixOS
- The tests defined in `passthru.tests`, if any, passed
- found 2025.06.002 in filename of file in /nix/store/lvxsd9w2pvsixiw98dvzf6x739c71yy2-elpa-2025.06.002

---

<details>
<summary>
<b>Rebuild report</b> (if merged into master) (click to expand)
</summary>

```
7 total rebuild path(s)

7 package rebuild(s)

First fifty rebuilds by attrpath

elpa
pkgsRocm.elpa
pkgsRocm.siesta
pkgsRocm.siesta-mpi
siesta
siesta-mpi
```

</details>

<details>
<summary>
<b>Instructions to test this update</b> (click to expand)
</summary>

---

Either **download from the cache**:
```
nix-store -r /nix/store/lvxsd9w2pvsixiw98dvzf6x739c71yy2-elpa-2025.06.002 \
  --option binary-caches 'https://cache.nixos.org/ https://nixpkgs-update-cache.nix-community.org/' \
  --option trusted-public-keys '
  nixpkgs-update-cache.nix-community.org-1:U8d6wiQecHUPJFSqHN9GSSmNkmdiFW7GW7WNAnHW0SM=
  cache.nixos.org-1:6NCHdD59X431o0gWypbMrAURkbJ16ZPMQFGspcDShjY=
  '
```
(The nixpkgs-update cache is only trusted for this store-path realization.)
For the cached download to work, your user must be in the `trusted-users` list or you can use `sudo` since root is effectively trusted.

Or, **build yourself**:
```
nix-build -A elpa https://github.com/r-ryantm/nixpkgs/archive/071a3b9d25568ce2b66f79431fd65a1e9bfbe3e9.tar.gz
```
Or:
```
nix build github:r-ryantm/nixpkgs/071a3b9d25568ce2b66f79431fd65a1e9bfbe3e9#elpa
```

After you've downloaded or built it, look at the files and if there are any, run the binaries:
```
ls -la /nix/store/lvxsd9w2pvsixiw98dvzf6x739c71yy2-elpa-2025.06.002
ls -la /nix/store/lvxsd9w2pvsixiw98dvzf6x739c71yy2-elpa-2025.06.002/bin
```

---

</details>
<br/>



### Pre-merge build results

We have automatically built all packages that will get rebuilt due to
this change.

This gives evidence on whether the upgrade will break dependent packages.
Note sometimes packages show up as _failed to build_ independent of the
change, simply because they are already broken on the target branch.

## `nixpkgs-review` result

Generated using [`nixpkgs-review`](https://github.com/Mic92/nixpkgs-review).

Command: `nixpkgs-review --extra-nixpkgs-config '{ allowBroken = false; }'`
Commit: `071a3b9d25568ce2b66f79431fd65a1e9bfbe3e9`

---
### `x86_64-linux`
<details>
  <summary>:white_check_mark: 6 packages built:</summary>
  <ul>
    <li>elpa</li>
    <li>elpa.dev</li>
    <li>elpa.doc</li>
    <li>elpa.man</li>
    <li>siesta</li>
    <li>siesta-mpi</li>
  </ul>
</details>

---

###### Maintainer pings

cc @markuskowa for [testing](https://github.com/nix-community/nixpkgs-update/blob/main/doc/nixpkgs-maintainer-faq.md#r-ryantm-opened-a-pr-for-my-package-what-do-i-do).

> [!TIP]
> As a maintainer, if your package is located under `pkgs/by-name/*`, you can comment **`@NixOS/nixpkgs-merge-bot merge`** to automatically merge this update using the [`nixpkgs-merge-bot`](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/ci/README.md#nixpkgs-merge-bot).
https://api.github.com/repos/NixOS/nixpkgs/pulls/481803